<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SC Bank Practices Prompt Investigation of Investor Losses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of the Strom Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:58:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: R Menton</title>
		<link>http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>R Menton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stromlaw.com/?p=761#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve worked in the banking industry for many years and have witnessed the greed of management and directors.  The last two years have been an eye opening experience.  Management foreclosing, driving the value down, directors forming LLC&#039;s and buying the &quot;reduced&quot; properties.  There should be a hot line for employees going stright to FDIC to report this type of greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve worked in the banking industry for many years and have witnessed the greed of management and directors.  The last two years have been an eye opening experience.  Management foreclosing, driving the value down, directors forming LLC&#8217;s and buying the &#8220;reduced&#8221; properties.  There should be a hot line for employees going stright to FDIC to report this type of greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Laye</title>
		<link>http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3701</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Laye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stromlaw.com/?p=761#comment-3701</guid>
		<description>Buying bank stock is the same as buying any stock........there are risks assoicated with that purchase.  There has been excessive greed and I would imagine there are directors and upper-manangement officials who have profited some how.  Generally banks do not allow directors, officers or employees to purchase collateral that has been repossessed or foreclosed on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying bank stock is the same as buying any stock&#8230;&#8230;..there are risks assoicated with that purchase.  There has been excessive greed and I would imagine there are directors and upper-manangement officials who have profited some how.  Generally banks do not allow directors, officers or employees to purchase collateral that has been repossessed or foreclosed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Ladson</title>
		<link>http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Ladson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stromlaw.com/?p=761#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>Directors do not oversee lending.  Loan committees generally advise and have knowledge of large loans however many loans rarely go to loan committe.  I think these are the majority of the loans that have been in the headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Directors do not oversee lending.  Loan committees generally advise and have knowledge of large loans however many loans rarely go to loan committe.  I think these are the majority of the loans that have been in the headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Abrams</title>
		<link>http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Abrams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stromlaw.com/?p=761#comment-3697</guid>
		<description>I worked with Beach First and can attest that lending practices were scewed.  I have a problem loan myself.  The Chief Credit Office, Katie Huntley, knowingly made me a loan to purchase equipment she already had a lien against.  I worked approximately 10 feet from her office and she never asked me or any member of Blessinga Bakery if Derek Cox owned the equipment.  The following is a synopsis.

I was a previous owner of Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins in Myrtle Beach, SC.  We entered into a contract to sale the stores; during the process we discovered an equipment lien filed by Beach First National Bank on behalf of the landlord for our 501 location.  The lien was filed on 12-16-04, 6 months prior to the store opening and prior to the execution of the lease.  Our opening date was June of 2005. 

The landlord, Derek Cox, applied for and was approved by BFNB for a construction loan to build the 501 location (construction loan 1st mtg date of 8-11-04 for $1M).  During construction he applied for a working capital line of credit and a SREM was filed in the amount of $250K.  Funds were advanced without any restrictions and the money was used for a host of things.  At maturity the working capital line of credit for TMM was renewed by the lender and a UCC lien was filed on the equipment that had not been ordered, nor was the building complete.

Dunkin requires you to order the equipment at least 6 months in advance.  On January 25, 2005 I secured a loan in the amount of $250K from the same bank, Beach First National Bank and the same loan officer to purchase the equipment for our 501 location. I was told that the bank could not use the equipment as collateral and I’d need to supply some other form of security. I used a piece of commercial property I owned free and clear in Conway as security.  I had no idea at that time that a UCC lien existed on the “future equipment” secured by the same bank. The equipment was paid for by a bank check clearly specifying purchase of equipment for 501 location.  The invoice from Paramount clearly shows my name as the owner and the store number which corresponds with the check issued for the full purchase price.

For two years we made payments on the equipment.  During that time we decided to sell the stores at which time our legal counsel discovered the UCC lien.  We continued with closing because the buyers threatened to sue us if we did not.  The sales price only covered the outstanding obligations.  I was left with a $250K debt I struggle to pay. 

I’ve spoken with the loan officer on numerous occasions and she said she had the right to file that lien since the landlord told her he owned the equipment.  The invoices are in my name, I have a copy of the check that was made payable to the equipment company signed by that same loan officer and a letter from the equipment company stating that it has never sold equipment to TMM or Derek Cox. At one point she did say she may have used the wrong location on the UCC. Her wrong address has cost me tremendously.  I’ve spoken with the President of the bank who is non-committal as well. 

During the discovery phase of the sale of the franchise I found a fraudulant lease he had given another bank for $10,000.00 a month on Blessings Bakery.  I presented a copy to the Chief Credit Officer as proof of Derek Cox&#039;s dishonesty.  Her only comment was that he wouldn&#039;t do anything like that.  She made him several more loans after learning of the fraudulent lease which have gone into foreclosure therefore investors lost more money because she failed to adher to her own guidelines and policies she had written for the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked with Beach First and can attest that lending practices were scewed.  I have a problem loan myself.  The Chief Credit Office, Katie Huntley, knowingly made me a loan to purchase equipment she already had a lien against.  I worked approximately 10 feet from her office and she never asked me or any member of Blessinga Bakery if Derek Cox owned the equipment.  The following is a synopsis.</p>
<p>I was a previous owner of Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins in Myrtle Beach, SC.  We entered into a contract to sale the stores; during the process we discovered an equipment lien filed by Beach First National Bank on behalf of the landlord for our 501 location.  The lien was filed on 12-16-04, 6 months prior to the store opening and prior to the execution of the lease.  Our opening date was June of 2005. </p>
<p>The landlord, Derek Cox, applied for and was approved by BFNB for a construction loan to build the 501 location (construction loan 1st mtg date of 8-11-04 for $1M).  During construction he applied for a working capital line of credit and a SREM was filed in the amount of $250K.  Funds were advanced without any restrictions and the money was used for a host of things.  At maturity the working capital line of credit for TMM was renewed by the lender and a UCC lien was filed on the equipment that had not been ordered, nor was the building complete.</p>
<p>Dunkin requires you to order the equipment at least 6 months in advance.  On January 25, 2005 I secured a loan in the amount of $250K from the same bank, Beach First National Bank and the same loan officer to purchase the equipment for our 501 location. I was told that the bank could not use the equipment as collateral and I’d need to supply some other form of security. I used a piece of commercial property I owned free and clear in Conway as security.  I had no idea at that time that a UCC lien existed on the “future equipment” secured by the same bank. The equipment was paid for by a bank check clearly specifying purchase of equipment for 501 location.  The invoice from Paramount clearly shows my name as the owner and the store number which corresponds with the check issued for the full purchase price.</p>
<p>For two years we made payments on the equipment.  During that time we decided to sell the stores at which time our legal counsel discovered the UCC lien.  We continued with closing because the buyers threatened to sue us if we did not.  The sales price only covered the outstanding obligations.  I was left with a $250K debt I struggle to pay. </p>
<p>I’ve spoken with the loan officer on numerous occasions and she said she had the right to file that lien since the landlord told her he owned the equipment.  The invoices are in my name, I have a copy of the check that was made payable to the equipment company signed by that same loan officer and a letter from the equipment company stating that it has never sold equipment to TMM or Derek Cox. At one point she did say she may have used the wrong location on the UCC. Her wrong address has cost me tremendously.  I’ve spoken with the President of the bank who is non-committal as well. </p>
<p>During the discovery phase of the sale of the franchise I found a fraudulant lease he had given another bank for $10,000.00 a month on Blessings Bakery.  I presented a copy to the Chief Credit Officer as proof of Derek Cox&#8217;s dishonesty.  Her only comment was that he wouldn&#8217;t do anything like that.  She made him several more loans after learning of the fraudulent lease which have gone into foreclosure therefore investors lost more money because she failed to adher to her own guidelines and policies she had written for the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Weigle</title>
		<link>http://blog.stromlaw.com/2010/07/21/sc-bank-practices-prompt-investigation-of-investor-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3663</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Weigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stromlaw.com/?p=761#comment-3663</guid>
		<description>Do not own any stock, but would like to know more about Sandhills</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not own any stock, but would like to know more about Sandhills</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

